Skip to main content

Hug a Tree, Stop a Mine and Find Peace

I once held a preconceived notion about peace. I believed that societies which are well-traveled and deeply aware of other cultures are inherently the most peaceful. My assumption was rooted in the idea that curiosity drives discovery, discovery fosters awareness, and awareness ultimately leads to peace and understanding. While it is true that curiosity and awareness do promote understanding, the critical question remains: does this understanding genuinely translate into peace? If so, then the most multicultural societies should logically be the most peaceful. However, reality often challenges such assumptions.

Statistics have a way of dismantling preconceived ideas. Cities like New York, London, Paris, and Sydney are among the most culturally diverse in the world, yet they are not necessarily the most peaceful. Similarly, one might assume that culturally diverse nations would naturally foster greater understanding and harmony among their populations. Yet, this is far from the truth. Take Chad, for example, a country in North-Central Africa that is one of the most ethnically diverse nations globally, with over 100 ethnic groups and 39 languages spoken. African countries, along with India, Canada, and the United States, rank highly on the diversity index. However, these nations do not fare as well in global peace rankings. If cultural diversity and multiculturalism are not the driving forces behind peace, then what is?

Could education and wealth be the answer? The short answer is no. Some of the wealthiest and most educated nations in the world do not rank highly on the Global Peace Index. This realization compelled me, as a seeker and inquirer, to reevaluate my understanding of peace. To truly uncover the answer, I had to let go of all my preconceived notions, beliefs, and teachings about peace and start with a clean slate. When conclusions are based on preexisting beliefs, they are inherently biased.

The concept of peace has been explored by world leaders, Nobel Prize winners, spiritual gurus, and philosophers. Countless speeches have been delivered, and volumes have been written on the subject. Yet, the answer lies not in complexity but in simplicity.

The top three countries on the Global Peace Index are Iceland, Denmark, and New Zealand. What sets these nations apart? The answer begins by closing your eyes and envisioning Iceland or New Zealand. What comes to mind? Images of pristine landscapes, clean air, and untouched natural beauty—places where trees, water, and mountains are often valued more than human endeavors, where environmental protection takes precedence over wealth. Attempt to exploit the land or sea in New Zealand, and you will face widespread protests. These nations prioritize their connection to nature and the protection of the planet above all else. Mother Nature, in their view, is alive and sacred. Peace is not just an abstract concept but a tangible energy that resonates through the environment. If you remain skeptical, take a walk in a forest, touch a tree, or gaze at an untouched mountain. Compare that experience to the sensation of breathing in a concrete jungle. Where do you feel more at peace?

The lesson is clear: to achieve peace, we must care for nature. Do not disturb the land, plant more trees, and cherish Mother Earth. We all originate from her, and so does peace. 

By Retnesh Raj
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond the Label: Reclaiming the Essence of Sanātana Dharma

In our increasingly interconnected world, labels often become convenient shortcuts, sometimes at the cost of nuance and accuracy. This is particularly true when discussing the rich tapestry of spiritual and philosophical traditions originating from the Indian subcontinent. The term "Hinduism," while widely used, can be both limiting and, at times, misrepresentative of the profound and timeless wisdom it seeks to encompass: Sanātana Dharma. This article is an invitation to both those outside and within this tradition to look beyond the conventional label and delve into its deeper essence, touching upon its origins, spread, and foundational philosophy as we've explored in our recent conversation. For those who are not followers of Sanātana Dharma, the term "Hinduism" often conjures images of a monolithic religion with a specific founder, a single holy book, and a rigid set of dogmas. This perception, shaped by Abrahamic models of religion, falls short of capturing...
Post a Comment
Read more

Long Lost Cousins.

From a young age, I have been fascinated by the striking similarities between Native Fijian culture and Hindu culture. Initially, I had little knowledge of Fijian traditions, but as I learned more, I discovered many intriguing connections. The Fijians, much like the South Indians, especially the people of Kerala, were skilled seafarers and warriors. Their food habits and clothing are quite similar to those of the South Indian coastal communities. It is well-documented that Micronesian sailors traveled long distances across the vast Pacific Ocean in their rigged sailing canoes. Similarly, Tamil explorers are believed to have sailed as far as New Zealand, navigating the Pacific with remarkable precision. A fascinating piece of evidence supporting this theory is a bell found in New Zealand's Te Papa Museum, which bears an inscription in Tamil. The words "Mohoyideen Buk’s ship’s bell" are etched on it, and it was used as a cooking vessel by the Maori people.  You can click he...
13 comments
Read more

The New Human

Last night, a casual conversation with a friend took an unexpected turn, leaving me pondering a question that kept me awake well into the early hours. The topic? What if humans didn’t need to eat to survive? My friend, who was growing frustrated with the routine of daily life, and I were unwinding with a few beers when I brought up the idea. After a brief pause, I asked, “But if we didn’t eat, how would we function?” My friend, a good listener, didn’t have much to say in response, but it was a question that lingered in my mind long after the conversation ended. As I continued to reflect on the idea, I came to an intriguing conclusion: If humans didn’t need food for energy, perhaps we could absorb energy directly from the sun and our surroundings, much like plants do. After all, plants use sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide to create energy through photosynthesis. While humans are far from being able to harness energy in that way, there are instances where we already absorb solar ener...
2 comments
Read more